Why is the Judge in the Anne Heche Estate Telling Her Ex-Boyfriend He is Wasting His Time?
By : Cory Hicks | Category : Probate | No Comments
13th Oct 2022
Update
I recently blogged about whether Anne Heche’s email could act as a Will. You can read the summary of the issues at that link, but basically her ex-boyfriend was trying to say a January 2011 email she sent him should control who is in charge of the estate and who should receive from her estate.
Wasting Time
According to Rolling Stone, the Judge in the Heche estate recently told the ex-boyfriend at a hearing that he was “largely wasting your time” challenging whether one of Heche’s sons should serve as Administrator.
Why would the Judge say that? And what does the Will issue have to do with who is in charge of the estate?
Why Would the Judge Say That?
In addition to naming who receives property in an estate, a Will normally names who is going to be in charge of the estate (a Personal Representative or executor or some other title depending on the state law and custom).
I have no insider information and have not studied the case deeply, but I believe this issue of who is in charge is linked to the validity of the Will. In Oklahoma, if there was a legitimate, valid Will, naming someone other than her sons, such as an ex-boyfriend, to be in charge of a case, the Court would have to follow that. Or at least look at it very closely.
There would be some extreme things that could disqualify a person named in a Will from serving. Those would be issues such as certain criminal behavior and the like.
But generally someone named to be in charge of an estate in a valid last will and testament will be appointed by the Court.
If there is no Will, the Court is guided to consider closest relatives first.
Therefore I think the Judge’s comments likely hit on a couple of things:
1. The email naming the ex-boyfriend to be in charge is unlikely to be found a Will. And therefore it is unlikely to govern and guide the Court’s orders.
2. The son in question probably has authority to serve and no serious conduct issue to disqualify him have been put before the Court.
We shall see how it plays out. And try to draw some lessons from these events in future posts.
Archived Posts
- July 2024
- January 2024
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- August 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- November 2014
- August 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- August 2013
- May 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011