Entirely in the TESTATOR’S Handwriting
By : Cory Hicks | Category : Estate Planning | No Comments
20th Aug 2019
In the last post we looked at the basic rule for a valid handwritten or “holographic” will in Oklahoma. The first requirement is that it must be “entirely written . . . by the hand of the testator himself,” as the statute states it. Said another way, it must be entirely in the testator’s handwriting.
This post is titled: “Entirely in the TESTATOR’S Handwriting.” This emphasis is given to make this important point. Not only must the will be handwritten entirely; it must be the handwriting of the testator.
Recent developments in the Aretha Franlkin Estate emphasize this aspect of holographic wills. It is reported that the Judge has allowed a handwriting expert examine documents which are potentially handwritten wills by Mrs. Franklin. (See prior posts here and here for a very basic overview of how it got to this point.)
At least one main purpose of handwriting analysis is to make sure the document was written by the testator, in this case Aretha Franklin.
Why is that important? Surely part of it is to make sure there is no fraud or other trickery going on.
But one huge issue is that a holograpic will (under OK law at least) must be entirely in the testator’s handwriting. For instance, another person cannot write it out in that persons’s handwriting and then have the testator sign it. This would include for thousands of “good” reasons: the testator was ill or otherwise could not write it, the other person was trying to be helpful, the testator asked the other person to write it for them, the other person had better penmanship, etc. A holographic will must be in entirely in the testator’s writing – alone.
This is further important because many handwritten documents would not otherwise qualify as a will if they do not meet the holographic will requirements.
The next post will look at another aspect of the handwriting requirements.
If our office may be of assistance to you in these areas, do not hesitate to contact us at (580) 686-4360 or at coryhicks@fieldandhicks.com or using any of our contact information in the profile. You can also visit www.fieldandhicks.com for more information.
This blog contains general information and the opinions of the author – not legal advice; you should seek the advice of competent counsel (attorney/lawyer) when considering any legal issues.
Archived Posts
- July 2024
- January 2024
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- August 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- November 2014
- August 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- August 2013
- May 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.