No Will – Who is in Charge? (Part 7)
By : Cory Hicks | Category : Probate | No Comments
28th Sep 2012
The last post addressed Okla. Stat. tit. 58 § 125 as an addition or clarification to the general rule of Okla. Stat. tit. 58 § 126 which forbids minors from serving as Administrators of estates, even if they are entitled to serve under the priority rules of Okla. Stat. tit. 58 § 122. However Okla. Stat. tit. 58 § 125 also raises some questions, some of which are dealt in later case law, particularly: In the Matter of the Estates of Watson, 135 P. 3d 853, 2006 OK CIV APP 55 (Okla. Civ. App. 2006). The next few posts will deal with various aspects of the Watson case.
Perhaps the most important issue the Watson case addressed was one of the questions raised in the last post: what kind of guardian qualifies under Okla. Stat. tit. 58 § 125?
Without getting into all the details of the law, there are several types of guardians under Oklahoma law. With respect to a minor, the one that is generally thought of is the general guardian of the person of the minor – the one the minor lives with and the one who takes care of the main details of the minor’s well being. The general guardian of the person is usually also the guardian of the minor’s property.
The Watson case established that a Court may appoint the guardian ad litem of a minor to act as Administrator on behalf of the minor under Okla. Stat. tit. 58 § 125.
A guardian ad litem is not the type of guardian that watches over the person or property of the minor, but they generally “represent” and watch out for the minor’s interest in a specific court case – such as a divorce of the minor’s parents or a case where the child is allegedly deprived by their parents or guardians.
The logic of the Court in Watson was primarily that Okla. Stat. tit. 58 § 125 does not expressly limit a guardian ad litem from serving. The legislature could have excluded guardian ad litems in the original law. And they could amend the statute in the future. But for now, courts will read this statute to include a guardian ad litem.
The Court in Watson also made special mention of the fact that both a guardian and a guardian ad litem can represent a minor in litigation generally. If they can represent a minor in litigation generally, why restrict them from representing them in a probate case?
Perhaps another factor in the Court’s decision was the finding in Watson that the guardian ad litem had in fact been the minor daughter’s custodian, despite lack of a formal general guardianship. However, it appears the ruling the Court put in place lays the groundwork for other guardian ad litems who are not custodians to qualify as Administrators, unless the appellate courts later very narrowly construe the case.
If our office may be of assistance to you in these areas, do not hesitate to contact us at (580) 338-6503 or at coryhicks@fieldandhicks.comor using any of our contact information in the profile. You can also visit www.fieldandhicks.com for more information.
This blog contains general information and the opinions of the author – not legal advice; you should seek the advice of competent counsel (attorney/lawyer) when considering any legal issues.
Archived Posts
- July 2024
- January 2024
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- August 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- November 2014
- August 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- August 2013
- May 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.